How do I change int_0^1int_0^sqrt(1-x^2)int_sqrt(x^2+y^2)^sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)xydzdydx to cylindrical or spherical coordinates?
3 Answers
Hello,
Answer :
I think you don't need to change coordinates. Fubini's theorem says that your integral is
-
Inner integral is
int_(sqrt(x^2+y^2))^(sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)) dz = sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)-sqrt(x^2+y^2) . -
Now, you have to calculate
int_0^(sqrt(1-x^2)) y(sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)-sqrt(x^2+y^2)) dy
= -1/2 int_0^(sqrt(1-x^2)) (-2)y sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)dy - 1/2 int_0^(sqrt(1-x^2)) 2y sqrt(x^2+y^2) dy
= -1/2 [(2-x^2-y^2)^(3/2)/(3/2)]_0^(sqrt(1-x^2)) - 1/2 [(x^2+y^2)^(3/2)/(3/2)]_0^(sqrt(1-x^2))
= -1/3 (1 - (2-x^2)^(3/2)) - 1/3 (1 - x^3)
= -2/3 + 1/3 (2-x^2)^(3/2) + 1/3 x^3 -
Finally you have to calculate
int_0^1 x(-2/3 + 1/3 (2-x^2)^(3/2) + 1/3 x^3) dx
= [- x^2/3 - 1/6 (2-x^2)^(5/2)/(5/2) + x^5/15]_0^1
= (-1/3 - 1/15+ 1/15) - (-1/15 2^(5/2))
= 1/15 2^(5/2) - 1/3 approx 0.0438
I haven't finished, but this will get you started.
(Note: there are hemispheres and semicircles in this problem, so there mat be a simple geometric solution. I haven't found one.)
int_0^1int_0^sqrt(1-x^2)int_sqrt(x^2+y^2)^sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)xydzdydx
Step 1:
int_sqrt(x^2+y^2)^sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)xydz=xyz]_(z=sqrt(x^2+y^2))^(z=sqrt(2-x^2-y^2))
=xysqrt(2-x^2-y^2)-xysqrt(x^2+y^2)
Step 2:
int_0^sqrt(1-x^2)[xysqrt(2-x^2-y^2)-xysqrt(x^2+y^2)]dy
(to be continued?)
I think this problem wants to be changed to cylindrical or spherical coordinates (But I don't remember how to do that.)
I'm going to ask.
Explanation:
I happened to come across this question and I see that in consideration to what was specifically being asked, it remains unanswered.
Considering the solid that is represented by these integrals (cone and sphere), spherical coordinates are a great choice. This is a lengthly answer, as a lot of students struggle with spherical coordinates and I'd like this explanation to be as helpful as possible.
A good (possibly mandatory) place to start is to get a rough sketch of the solid represented by the integrals. From the limits of integration, we have:
sqrt(x^2+y^2) <= z <= sqrt(2-x^2-y^2)
0 <= y <= sqrt(1-x^2)
0 <= x <= 1
Examining the
z=sqrt(x^2+y^2) andz=sqrt(2-x^2-y^2) We can look at each equation separately. The first represents a cone. We can see this better by manipulating the equation. Squaring both sides, we get:
z^2=x^2+y^2 If we set
x=0 , we getz^2=y^2=>z=y . This is a line through theyz -plane at45^o . Similarly, if we sety=0 , we get the same line through thexz -plane. Ifz is a constant (>=0 ), we have a circle in thexy -plane with radiusz .The second equation represents a sphere with radius
sqrt2 . We can see this more easily by squaring both sides and rearranging:
z^2=2-x^2-y^2=>x^2+y^2+z^2=2 Setting any one variable to
0 yields a circle with radiussqrt2 in the corresponding plane of the remaining non-zero variables.As
z runs from the cone to the sphere, we are looking at the volume inside both the sphere and the cone. This is a common solid that shows up in problems concerning triple integrals in spherical coordinates.Because spherical coordinates are of the form (
rho, theta, phi ), whererho represents a sphere of some radius,phi represents a half-cone, andtheta represents a plane, a solid consisting of both a cone and a sphere makes a great candidate for spherical coordinates. In my opinion, it is also easier to evaluate the given triple integral using this coordinate system, so long as you convert the limits of integration and integrand correctly.
Examining the
y=0 andy=sqrt(1-x^2) The first statement tells us that
y>=0 , meaning that we will start from the origin and concern ourselves only with the part of the solid that pertains to positivey values. Or, if you're looking at the axes oriented with the positivex axis coming out toward you, we're only concerned with the right side of the solid.The second equation is that of a circle with radius
1 . We can square both sides and rearrange to see this more easily:
y^2=1-x^2=>x^2+y^2=1 This tells us that if we push the solid down so that it lies only in the
xy -plane, we have a circle with radius1 , and again, we are only concerned with the right half of the circle.
Examining the
x=0 andx=1 The first statement tells us that
x>=0 , meaning that we will start from the origin and concern ourselves only with the part of the solid that pertains to positivex values. Given that we also want only positivey values, we know that we only want the part of the solid which lies in the first octant.The second statement reminds us that we are considering the entire radius of the circle, form the origin to the "edge."
Putting all of this information together, the solid represented by the triple integral is contained within a cone and sphere in the first octant. For the purposes of visualization, this is essentially one-fourth of a snow cone.
Here is a graph I've generated with Mathematica:
A view from the top:
Now, the task of rewriting the triple integral in spherical coordinates...
We're given the triple integral in rectangular coordinates, which are likely most familiar to us. This allowed us to get a graph of the solid which we can now use to rewrite in spherical coordinates. Recall that spherical coordinates are of the form (
The variable
rho represents the distance we come out from the origin to a point on the edge of our solid. For example,rho=2 represents a sphere with radius2 . Our range forrho is from the origin to the radus of the sphere,sqrt2 . Therefore,rho runs from0 tosqrt(2) .Next,
theta . When we determine the bounds fortheta , we're looking at the angle from the positivex -axis. You can imagine the unit circle is imposed on thexy -plane, where the positivex -axis begins at0 . Note that0 <= theta <=2pi . It's as though we're taking the positivex -axis and revolving it around the origin until we've come back to where we started, forming a circle. In this case, our solid is contained within the first octant, sotheta runs from0 topi/2 . It is one-fourth of the circle.
lamar.edu
phi is also an angle, but illustrates that we are now working in three dimensions. It is the angle beginning from the positivez -axis and ending at the negativez -axis. In other words,0 <= phi <=pi . You can imagine the positivez -axis being folded down to overlap the negativez -axis to visualize the anglephi . Because our solid is contained in the first octant and lies above thexy -plane, were are restricted betweenphi=0 andphi=pi/2 . However, because our solid lies within the cone, which has equationz^2=x^2+y^2 , the furthestphi gets is to the edge of the cone atpi/4 . Recall thatz=y is the edge of the cone in theyz -plane which separates the plane at an angle of45^o above the horizontal. Thus,phi runs from0 topi/4 . You can also find the point of intersection between the sphere and cone. Plug the equation of the cone into the sphere and solve forz . We will use the positive value as we know we are in the first octant wherez is positive. We put this value along with the value we determined forrho into the conversion forz to find where the sphere and cone intersect:
x^2+y^2+z^2=2
(sqrt(x^2+y^2))^2+z^2=2
z^2+z^2=2
2z^2=2
z^2=1
z=+-1=>z=1 The conversion for
z isz=rhocos(phi)
=>rhocos(phi)=1
cos(phi)=1/rho As we know that
rho=sqrt2 :
=>cos(phi)=1/sqrt(2)
phi=cos^-1(1/(sqrt2))
phi=pi/4
This would be the whole solid, if
We now have our new limits of integration:
int_0^(pi/4)int_0^(pi/2)int_0^sqrt(2) Note that
theta andrho can be flipped, but you will typically see the integration with respect torho first.
Lastly, we need to convert the integrand from rectangular to spherical. Conversions are given as:
x=rhosin(phi)cos(theta)
y=rhosin(phi)sin(theta)
dzdydx=>rho^2sin(phi)drhod(theta)dphi
Putting it all together, we have:
int_0^(pi/4)int_0^(pi/2)int_0^sqrt(2)(rhosin(phi)cos(theta)*rhosin(phi)sin(theta)*rho^2sin(phi))drhod(theta)dphi
Which simplifies to:
int_0^(pi/4)int_0^(pi/2)int_0^sqrt(2)[rho^4sin^3(phi)sin(theta)cos(theta)]drhod(theta)dphi
We can evaluate the integral as well:
To integrate with respect to
u=sin(theta)=>du=cos(theta)d(theta) Note the limits of integration change (
sin(0)=0, sin(pi/2)=1 ).
=>(4sqrt2)/5int_0^(pi/4)int_0^(1)[sin^3(phi)u]dudphi
=>(4sqrt2)/5int_0^(pi/4)[1/2u^2sin^3(phi)]|_0^1dphi
=>(4sqrt2)/10int_0^(pi/4)[sin^3(phi)]dphi
To integrate with respect to
=>(4sqrt2)/10int_0^(pi/4)[sin(phi)*sin^2(phi)]dphi
=>(4sqrt2)/10int_0^(pi/4)[sin(phi)*(1-cos^2(phi))]dphi
Now we use a substitution:
u=cos(phi)=>du=-sin(phi)dphi Note that the limits of integration change (
cos(0)=1, cos(pi/4)=(sqrt2)/2 )
=>-(4sqrt2)/10int_1^(sqrt2/2)(1-u^2)du
=>-(4sqrt2)/10(u-1/3u^3)|_1^((sqrt2)/2)
=>-(4sqrt2)/10[((sqrt2)/2-1/3(sqrt2/2)^3)-(1-1/3(1)^3)]
=>-(4sqrt2)/10(sqrt2/2-sqrt2/12-1+1/3)
=>-(4sqrt2)/10((5sqrt2)/12-2/3)
=>(4sqrt2)/15-1/3