How many electrons in an iron(III) cation have #n + l + m_l = 4# ?

2 Answers
Jan 28, 2015

Let's start by showing the electron configuration of a neutral #"Fe"# atom, which has a total of 26 electrons.

#"Fe": 1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6) 3s^(2)3p^(6)4s^(2)3d^(6)#

#"Fe"^(3+)# has 3 less electrons than #"Fe"#; these electrons will be removed starting from the outermost shell, which in #"Fe"#'s case will be #4s# and #3d#. The first two will come from #4s# and the last one will come from #3d#. So,

#"Fe"^(3+): 1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6) 3s^(2)3p^(6)3d^(5)#

We've established that #"Fe"^(3+)# has #"26 - 23 = 26"# electrons. I assume the #"m"# you're asking for is actually #"m"_l#, the magnetic quantum number. Let's start counting the electrons that meet the #"n + l + m = 4"# criterion.

When #"n=1"#, you only get one choice for #"l"# and #""m"_l#, that is #"l = 0"# and #"m"_l = 0"#. This clearly doesn't satisfy the criterion. Moving on.

When #"n=2"#, you now get multiple values for #"l"# and #"m"_l#. If #"l"=0#, #"m"_l# is again equal to zero and your equation is #"2 + 0+ 0"#.

When #"l=1"#, #"m"_l# can be equal to #"-1"#, #0#, or #+1#. As you can see, we've found our first match: #"2 + 1 + 1 = 4#. Since the spin quantum number can be either #"-1/2"# or #"+1/2"#, we've found the first two electrons that match the equation.

When #"n=3"#, you've got multiple choices again, since #"l"# can be either #0#, #1# or #2#. When #"l = 0"#, #"m"_l =0# and we don't have a match.

Let's take the case when #"l=1"#. In this case, #"m"_l# can once again be #"-1"#, #0#, or #+1#. When #"m"_l# is equal to zero, we have another match: #"3 + 1 + 0 =4"#. Two more electrons meet the criterion.

If #"l"=2#, which means that #"m"_l# can be #"-2"#, #"-1"#, #"0"#, #"+1"#, and #"+2"#, we can see that we get one more option, #"m"_l "= -1"#. We have #"3 + 2 + (-1) = 4#.

Here's where it gets a little tricky. Notice that the #3d# subshell is only half-full. This means that each of the five 3d-orbitals will only hold 1 electron. As a result, just one electron meets the criterion this time.

Add up all the electrons and you'll get #"2 + 2 + 1 = 5"# electrons satisfy the criterion given.

Jan 28, 2015

in #Fe^(3+)# there are 5 electrons for which the value of #n+l+m=4#

The electron structure of iron is :

#1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)3s^(2)3p^(6)3d^(6)4s^(2)#

When #Fe^(3+)# forms the 4s are lost and one of the 3d to give:

#1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)3s^(2)3p^(6)3d^(5)#

#n# is the principal quantum number and has integral values 1, 2, 3....etc
#l# is the angular momentum quantum number and takes integral values of 0 up to #(n-1)#
#m# is the magnetic quantum number and takes integral values of #-l#..through to 0 up to #+l#

Non of the 1s or 2s electrons can reach a sum of 4 for these numbers but for the #2p^(6)# electrons:

#n=2# , #l=1# and #m# can be -1 , 0 or 1 (these are the #p_x, p_y and p_z# electrons)

So 2 of these electrons has #n=2,l=1 and m=1# i.e a sum of 4

For #3s^(2)# #n=3#, #l=0# and #m=0# so non of them can add up to 4.

For #3p^(6)#, #n=3#, #l=1# and #m# can be -1, 0 , or 1

So there are 2 electrons with #n=3#, #l=1# and #m=0#

For #3d^(5)#, #n=3#, #l=2# and #m# can be -2, -1, 0, 1, 2

There is only one electron where #n+l+m=4# which is #n=3,l=2and m=-1#. This is because the 3d orbitals are singly occupied so the electrons take separate values of #m#.

So the total number of electrons which have #n+l+m=4# is 2 + 2 + 1 = 5.