Which is more effective, using single extraction with a large volume of solvent or several extractions with smaller volumes of solvent?

2 Answers
Write your answer here...
Start with a one sentence answer
Then teach the underlying concepts
Don't copy without citing sources
preview
?

Answer

Write a one sentence answer...

Answer:

Explanation

Explain in detail...

Explanation:

I want someone to double check my answer

Describe your changes (optional) 200

6

This answer has been featured!

Featured answers represent the very best answers the Socratic community can create.

Learn more about featured answers

Oct 11, 2016

Answer:

Several extractions with smaller volumes of solvent are more effective than a single extraction with a large volume of solvent.

Explanation:

The mass of solute #"X"# that can be extracted in a single extraction is determined by the distribution coefficient #K#:

#K = "[X]"_text(o)/"[X]"_text(aq) = (m_o/V_o)/(m_(aq)/V_(aq)) = (m_oV_(aq))/(m_(aq) V_o#

where

#o# and #aq# represent the organic and the aqueous phases
#m# is the mass of solute in each phase.

Let #m = "total mass of solute"#

Let #m_o = xcolor(white)(l) "g"#.

Then #m_(aq) = (m - x)color(white)(l)"g"#

The formula becomes

#K = (xV_(aq))/((m - x)V_o)#

#K(m-x)V_o = xV_(aq)#

#KmV_o - KxV_o = xV_(aq)#

#KmV_o = KxV_o + xV_(aq) = x(KV_o + V_(aq))#

#x = (KmV_o)/(KV_o + V_(aq)) = m/(1 + V_(aq)/(KV_o))#

Example:

If #D = 4.0#, what mass of compound #"X"# can be extracted from a solution of 10.0 g of #"X"# in 100 mL of water (a) with a single portion of 150 mL of ether? (b) using three 50 mL portions?

(a) Single extraction

#x = m/(1 + V_(aq)/(KV_o)) = "10.0 g"/(1 + (100 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mL"))))/(4.0 × 150 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mL"))))) = "10.0 g"/1.167 = "8.6 g"#

∴ 8.6 g extracted and 1.4 g remaining.

We have extracted 86 % of the compound.

(b) Three extractions

First extraction

#x = m/(1 + V_(aq)/(KV_o)) = "10.0 g"/(1 + (100 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mL"))))/(4.0 × 50 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mL"))))) = "10.0 g"/1.50 = "6.7 g"#

∴ 6.7 g extracted and 3.3 g remaining.

Second Extraction

#x = "3.3 g"/1.50 = "2.2 g"#

∴ 8.9 g extracted and 1.1 g remaining.

Third extraction

#x = "1.1 g"/1.50 = "0.7 g"#

∴ 9.6 g extracted and 0.4 g remaining.

We have extracted 96 % of the compound.

Multiple extractions are more efficient than a single extraction with the same volume of solvent.

Was this helpful? Let the contributor know!
1500
Write your answer here...
Start with a one sentence answer
Then teach the underlying concepts
Don't copy without citing sources
preview
?

Answer

Write a one sentence answer...

Answer:

Explanation

Explain in detail...

Explanation:

I want someone to double check my answer

Describe your changes (optional) 200

4
Oct 11, 2016

Answer:

The multiple extraction method is more effective in terms of yield.

Explanation:

When you extract, the residue will have the same concentration of material as the extract itself. If you extract again, the concentration will be lower, in the extract as well as in the residue.

So with multiple extractions the amount of material left in the residue will be lower, ergo the extraction will be more complete.

Was this helpful? Let the contributor know!
1500
Impact of this question
Answer impact map
2173 views around the world
You can reuse this answer
Creative Commons License