Question #fdcf3

1 Answer
Mar 27, 2017

Perimeter of the larger rectangle is #72ft#
Perimeter of the smaller rectangle is #32ft#

Explanation:

There are two possible answers to this question because there is no indication of whether the scaling factor is up or down.

When a dimension is scaled, its resulting size is usually much smaller than full scale so it can be represented by a drawing or scale model.

In this case the exercise may be to measure out a larger or smaller rectangle for use on a field.

We know the perimeter of the original rectangle is #48ft#

We also know that the perimeter #P# of the rectangle is defined as:

#P=2L+2W# which states #P# is directly proportional to #L+W#

And this means that if #L# or #W# were to get bigger, P will get bigger, and if #L# or #W# were to get smaller P will get smaller.

The question also states that BOTH #L# and #W# are scaled by the same factor of #1.5#
This means the sum of the dimensions #L+W# is scaled by #1.5#

It also means that the Perimeter is scaled by #1.5# as it is proportional to #L+W#.

Then if we upscale (enlarge) the dimension of a #48ft# field by #1.5#,

#P=48*1.5=72ft#

Then if we downscale (reduce) the dimension of a #48ft# field by #1.5#,

#P=48/1.5=32ft#

The answer can be tested by choosing some values for #L,W#

Original:#L=14, W=10; P=48=2(14)=2(10)#

Upscale:#L=14*1.5, W=10*1.5; P=72=2(21)=2(15)#

Downscale:#L=14/1.5, W=10/1.5; P=32=2(9.3)=2(6.7)#