Question #5d92a

3 Answers
Jun 23, 2017

4s.f

1,150×106

Explanation:

(2920.2)×(1.79×105)1.37

Solution

8.8×1.79×1051.37

1,575,2001.37

1,149.781.022

1,150,000=4s.f

1,150×106

Jul 13, 2017

1.15×106 to 3 significant figures.

Explanation:

If you use the decimals as they are given and calculate the answer, you will get an exact result:

(2920.2)×1.79×1051.37

=1,149,781.022

This answer has 10 significant figures.

However, such as answer is not practical. There are usually guidelines given as to the accuracy of the answer.
This also varies from subject to subject.

The greatest level of accuracy for any of the numbers is to 2 decimal places. But in comparison to 1.79×105, 2 decimal places has no significance.

=1,149,781.022 is given to 10 sig figs.

=1,149,781 is given to the nearest integer.

=1,150,000 is given to 4 sig figs (3 would be the same)
This would be my choice as it is of a similar size to the biggest value.

The most appropriate answer for the situation should be given.

The answer should be in the same format as the question, so we can write it in scientific notation as 1.15×106

Jul 15, 2017

1.1×106
Two

Explanation:

As we observe the expression has three factors.

  1. (2920.2)
    It consists of two numbers
    (a) 29 has two significant figures and
    (b) 20.2 has three significant figures.
    Since both are stated within parenthesis their final result has Two Significant Figures.

  2. 1.79×105
    Once we write a number in scientific notation, the number of significant figures is taken from the non-exponent number part.
    We see that in this number it is
    1.79 has three significant figures.

  3. 1.37
    This has three significant figures.

As such, the final result must be stated in scientific notation with two significant figures (least of all).

The given expression =1149781.02

In scientific notation with accuracy of two significant figures final result is =1.1×106