What is the ratio of average kinetic energy for hydrogen and helium molecules, if helium is twice as massive?

1 Answer
Jul 27, 2017

Irrespective of their molar masses, #"He"# ATOM has approximately #60%# the average molar kinetic energy that #"H"_2# MOLECULE does at #25^@ "C"# and #"1 atm"#.

If you do not quite follow what it means to be at the high temperature limit, this answer may also help.


Well, I assume you mean only #"He"# is an atom, and not a molecule... #"He"# is an atom, and #"H"_2# is a molecule. Only then is one's molar mass twice that of the other.

  • As an atom, #"He"# can only translate, i.e. shoot forward and backwards via cartesian degrees of freedom, having only translational average kinetic energy #K_("trans")#.
  • #"H"_2# can vibrate, at vibrational frequency #omega ~~ "4394.49 cm"^(-1)#. #"H"_2# can also rotate, with #2# degrees of freedom (#theta,phi# in spherical coordinates).

We honestly don't care about their molar masses, because they don't make a difference here. The average molar kinetic energy according to the equipartition theorem is:

#<< kappa >> ~~ K_(avg)/n = N/2 RT#,

where:

  • #N# is the number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) for a particular type of motion (translational, rotational, and vibrational are the most important).
  • #R# and #T# are known from the ideal gas law.

This theorem applies at the so-called high temperature limit, where the energy level spacings of each kind of motion (translational, rotational, vibrational) are much smaller than #k_B T# where #k_B# is the Boltzmann constant.

  • This (pretty much) always applies for translational DOFs.
  • This usually applies for rotational DOFs, except for molecules with particularly low moments of inertia. This applies for #"H"_2# with no problem (for #"H"_2#, it would be a problem below approximately #"88 K"#).
  • For vibrational DOFs, given the high vibrational frequency of #"H"_2#, we can safely say that ignoring the vibrational DOFs of #"H"_2# is more accurate than including them.

We can break up the kinetic energy into translational and rotational parts, then, to a good approximation:

#<< kappa >> ~~ << kappa >>_"trans" + << kappa >>_"rot"#, for #"H"_2#

For #"He"#, #<< kappa >>_"rot" ~~ 0#, because atoms cannot rotate and turn out to look any different under the hard sphere approximation.

So, the ratio of the average kinetic energies is:

#color(blue)((<< kappa >>_("H"_2))/(<< kappa >>_("He"))) = (<< kappa >>_("H"_2, "trans") + << kappa >>_("H"_2, "rot"))/(<< kappa >>_("He","trans"))#

#= (3/2 RT + 2/2 RT)/(3/2 RT)#

#= 5/2 xx 2/3 = color(blue)(5/3)#

So, on average, according to the equipartition theorem at high enough temperatures, an ensemble of #"H"_2# molecules will have #bb(1.67)# times the kinetic energy of an analogous ensemble of #"He"# atoms.