For which natural numbers "n" is irrelevance?

x - real number
x > -1

#(1+x)^n > 1+nx#

have to prove

1 Answer
Feb 25, 2018

#n>1# for this to be true. You can use the "Racetrack Principle " or the Mean Value Theorem to prove it.

Explanation:

Let #f(x)=(1+x)^n# and #g(x)=1+nx# for #n>1#. Note that both #f# and #g# are continuous and differentiable for all #x# and that #f(0)=g(0)=1#.

Next, we compute #f'(x)=n(1+x)^(n-1)# and #g'(x)=n#. Since #n>1#, we have #n-1>0#.

Therefore, for #x>0#, #f'(x)>n*1^(n-1)=n=g'(x)#.

On the other hand, for #-1 < x < 0# we have #0<1+x<1# and #f'(x) < n*1^(n-1)=n=g'(x)#.

Putting these facts together and applying the Racetrack Principal allows us to say that #f(x) > g(x)# for #x>0# and for #-1 < x < 0#. In other words, #(1+x)^(n) > 1+nx# for #x>0# and for #-1 < x < 0# (they are equal when #x=0#).