Prove the logarithmic property?

Let #b, x, y in RR^+ # such that #b!= 1#
Prove that:
#log_(1/b)x=-log _b x#
I have tried doing it quite a few times each time using a different method, but I still do something wrong. I think I am just making a small mistake somewhere but I have run out of ideas on how to tackle this one.
Thank you very much.

2 Answers
Jul 15, 2018

Please refer to a Proof in Explanation.

Explanation:

Suppose that, #log_(1/b)x=m#.

#:. (1/b)^m=x#.

#:. (b^-1)^m=x#.

#:. b^-m=x#.

#:. log_b(b^-m)=log_bx#.

#:. -mlog_b b=log_bx#.

#:. -m*1=log_b x#.

#:. m=-log_b x#.

# or, log_(1/b)x=-log_b x#, as desired!

Jul 15, 2018

Please see below.

Explanation:

We know that , for #m,n inRR^+ and k in RR^(+) -{1}#

#color(red)((1)"Change of Base formula :"#

#color(red)(log_n m=(log_k m)/(log_k n#

#color(blue)((2)"Quotient/Difference formula :"#

#color(blue)(log_k(A/B)=log_k A-log_kB#

We take LHS :

#LHS=color(red)(log_(1/b) x)............tocolor(red)(Apply(1)#

#LHS=color(red)((log_k x)/(log_k (1/b)#

Using #color(blue)((2)# in the denominator ,we get

#LHS=(log_k x)/color(blue)((log_k 1-log_k b))#

#LHS=(log_k x)/(0-log_k b)to[because log_k1=0]#

#LHS=-log_kx /log_k b#

Again using #(1)#

#LHS==-log_b x#

#LHS=RHS#