Question dealing with pseudo-first order reaction?

I really only want the answer to part a), but I'd appreciate the rest as well.

enter image source here

1 Answer
Feb 21, 2018

#(a)#

You only know that #C# is zero order, but that #B# is second order. Therefore, you do not assume that #Delta[B] = 0#, and you still don't assume that #Delta[C] = 0# either (only that #C# does not affect the rate).

However, we see that #[B]# and #[C]# are about #100# times larger than #[A]#, so we assume that the reaction is pseudo-first order with respect to #A#, i.e. that

#Delta[B]# #"<<"# #Delta[A]#
#Delta[C]# #"<<"# #Delta[A]#

Therefore, we can use the first-order integrated rate law for one reactant to get #k'#:

#ln[A] = -k't + ln[A]_0#

where #t# is the current time, #[A]# is concentration of #A# in #"M"#, and #[A]_0# is the starting concentration of #A#.

Solving for #k'#,

#ln(([A])/([A]_0)) = -k't#.

This gives

#color(blue)(k') = 1/tln(([A]_0)/([A]))#

#= 1/("8 s") ln((1.0 xx 10^(-2) "M")/(3.0 xx 10^(-3) "M"))#

#= color(blue)("0.15 s"^(-1))#

Since the reaction is supposed to be pseudo-first order,

#r(t) = k[A][B]^2~~ k'[A]#

What we actually got was #k' = "0.15 s"^(-1)#, so we can rewrite this as:

#color(blue)(k) ~~ (k')/([B]^2) ~~ ("0.15 s"^(-1))/("3.0 M")^2#

#= color(blue)("0.0167 M"^(-2)cdot"s"^(-1))#

for the overall reaction.

#(b)#

So then, as before, we assume that this is pseudo-first order with respect to #A#, giving a pseudo-first order half-life based on #A#.

#ln(1/2[A]_0) = -kt_(1//2) + ln[A]_0#

#ln((1/2[A]_0)/([A]_0)) = -kt_(1//2)#

#ln2 = kt_(1//2)#

Therefore, the half-life is:

#color(blue)(t_(1//2)) = (ln2)/k#

#= (ln2)/("0.15 s"^(-1)) = color(blue)("4.6 s")#

#(c)#

This can again be done using the first-order integrated rate law.

#ln[A] = -kt + ln[A]_0#

#color(blue)([A]) = [A]_0e^(-kt)#

#= 1.0 xx 10^(-2) "M" cdot e^(-"0.15 s"^(-1) cdot "13.0 s")#

#= color(blue)(1.4 xx 10^(-3) "M")#

Does this make physical sense? Well, it took longer than #8# seconds, and this concentration is indeed less than #3.0 xx 10^(-3) "M"# accomplished after #8# seconds.

#(d)#

For #C#, consider the stoichiometry of the problem. You will consume twice as much #C# as you do #A#.

(The reaction is zero order with respect to #C# though, so keep that in mind. If we didn't have #Delta[A]#, we wouldn't have any idea how to get #[C]# at any time #t# because #C# doesn't influence the rate.)

After #"13.0 s"#, #A# decreased by:

#|Delta[A]| = |1.4 xx 10^(-3) "M" - 1.0 xx 10^(-2) "M"|#

#= 8.6 xx 10^(-3) "M"#

#C# would decrease by twice as much, so

#|Delta[C]| = 2(8.6 xx 10^(-3) "M") = 1.7 xx 10^(-2) "M"#

Therefore,

#color(blue)([C]_(13)) = [C]_0 - |Delta[C]_(0->13)|#

#= "2.0 M" - 1.7 xx 10^(-2) "M"#

#=# #"1.98 M"#

#~~# #color(blue)("2.0 M")# to two sig figs.

(It was only a #0.86%# reduction in #[C]#.)

This proves that the assumption for a pseudo-first order reaction is good.