Loading...
MetaPhysik
has helped students
times in
Activity
Summary of contribution activity by day
Longest streak: 25 days
MetaPhysik
MetaPhysik joined Socratic
4 months ago.
MetaPhysik hasn't written a biography yet.
13K
karma
Activity
154 Answers
27 Edits
13 Asked
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented And ... in light of the Newton 3rd law, the fluid pushes back on the object. on Why does a buoyant force act on every object in a fluid?
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented If that's someone thought, it meant that it's up to interpretation. I took it as bonding (which is a very basic concept) already established, you took it as the person still thinking about in atomic state. Then from our prospective, we are both right. I should have listed the p-bonding energy states nomenclatures, then we don't have these dialogs. on How Can Bonding And Antibonding Electron Can Be Identified In 2p Orbital?
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented That is not the question asks. I think that is where we are different. You and I are reading the same question very differently. May be the better solution is to have the person who asked this question to clarity it: was he thinking about single atom. If so, he asked meaningless question. The question ask about to identify bonding and anti-bonding in 2p orbital. Since you can't have bonding of an atom by itself, my reading of it is to immediately project that molecular bonds are already established, and that to tell electrons of these bonding states apart is by their energies. It seems to me Your Interpretation is WRONG!!! The key word is bonding, the questioners should understand that it takes two to bond! on How Can Bonding And Antibonding Electron Can Be Identified In 2p Orbital?
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik wrote an answer to How can we draw magnetic field lines? .
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented Very good, Truing-Son, you explanation above validates that pi-bonding and anti-pi-bonding do exist, and that they do come from p-orbitals. The energy diagram clearly shows that anti-bonding state has higher energy than bonding state. Please also mention that electrons in anti-bonding state carry more energy than electrons in bonding state. That is how you tell them apart.
on How Can Bonding And Antibonding Electron Can Be Identified In 2p Orbital? -
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented Hm...we have difference, maybe we are not reading the question the same. The question itself implies there exist bonding and anti bonding, and that how do you tell these electrons from these orbital apart. My answer is that you can tell them apart by energies, and that they could be the same electron. In reality, all electrons are identical, but they do have different energies. Are you disagreeing on that? This is a basic principle!
At first you said: A 2porbital has no antibonding and bonding electrons. It is atomic in nature. Next you switch to molecular orbitals. Which version you want to keep? Can't be both. on How Can Bonding And Antibonding Electron Can Be Identified In 2p Orbital? -
@mrphysik MetaPhysik commented Truong-son, for your reference, but still waiting for your reference.
http://www.cpp.edu/~psbeauchamp/pdf/314_lect_02.pdf on How Can Bonding And Antibonding Electron Can Be Identified In 2p Orbital? -
@mrphysik MetaPhysik wrote an answer to If one neutron is added to Helium nucleus, the result is? a) Lithium b) Helium c) Hydrogen d) Carbon .
-
@mrphysik MetaPhysik asked the question #intx^3e^(x^3)dx=?# .
- Show more activity
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...