Question #d0dfe

2 Answers
Mar 25, 2015

When you divide, say, 30 you are trying to find a result such as:
30=a
But this number a should be a number that multiplied by 0 gives 3!
30=a so rearranging 3=0a
But this is not possible!
So, it is not possible to divide by 0.

On the other hand have a look at what happens if you get "near" to zero but not zero.
Try 0.01, 0.0001, 0.000001 and see what happens!

Mar 25, 2015

You can't do it.
(Any attempt to define division by zero will "break arithmetic" somewhere.)

Reason 1:

ab=c exactly when bc=a

But if b=0, we have

a0=c exactly when 0c=a

0c=a has no solution for a0 because 0c=0 for all c.

(For example: 50=c would require 0c=5 which cannot happen.)

Reason 2:

I am an algebraist, I define division to be multiplication by a reciprocal.

A reciprocal of a is a multiplicative inverse. That is, it is a solution to ax=multiplicative identity

For any number, x, we can show that 0x=0 So 0 has no multiplicative inverse (no reciprocal).

0x+x=0x+1x=(0+1)x=1x=x
0x+x=x implies that 0x=0 (Subtract x from both sides.)

(General case)
In any ring whose additive identity is denoted 0,
we have 0x=0 and x0=0 for all x.
So the only ring in which 0 has a reciprocal is the trivial ring: {0}.
(The trivial ring has one thing in it. That thing is the additive and multiplicative identities. In non-trivial rings, it is not possible for both identities to be the same.)