Question #d0dfe

2 Answers
Mar 25, 2015

When you divide, say, #3/0# you are trying to find a result such as:
#3/0=a#
But this number #a# should be a number that multiplied by #0# gives #3#!
#3/0=a# so rearranging #3=0*a#
But this is not possible!
So, it is not possible to divide by #0#.

On the other hand have a look at what happens if you get "near" to zero but not zero.
Try #0.01#, #0.0001#, #0.000001# and see what happens!

Mar 25, 2015

You can't do it.
(Any attempt to define division by zero will "break arithmetic" somewhere.)

Reason 1:

#a/b = c# exactly when #b*c=a#

But if #b=0#, we have

#a/0 = c# exactly when #0*c=a#

#0*c=a# has no solution for #a!=0# because #0*c=0# for all #c#.

(For example: #5/0=c# would require #0*c=5# which cannot happen.)

Reason 2:

I am an algebraist, I define division to be multiplication by a reciprocal.

A reciprocal of #a# is a multiplicative inverse. That is, it is a solution to #a*x="multiplicative identity"#

For any number, #x#, we can show that #0*x=0# So #0# has no multiplicative inverse (no reciprocal).

#0x+x=0x+1x=(0+1)x=1x=x#
#0x+x=x# implies that #0x=0# (Subtract #x# from both sides.)

(General case)
In any ring whose additive identity is denoted #0#,
we have #0 x=0# and #x0=0# for all #x#.
So the only ring in which #0# has a reciprocal is the trivial ring: #{0}#.
(The trivial ring has one thing in it. That thing is the additive and multiplicative identities. In non-trivial rings, it is not possible for both identities to be the same.)