Is f(x)=-xln(2x^2) increasing or decreasing at x=-1?

2 Answers
Apr 4, 2016

It is impossible to determine because the gradient is a complex number.

Explanation:

The question is essentially asking whether f'(x) < "or" > 0 at x = -1.

To answer this we need to find the derivative of f(x).

Start by taking out the exponent inside the logarithm

-xln(2x^2) = -2xln(2x)

You can differentiate this using the product rule, where

f(x) = g(x) * h(x)
f'(x) = g'(x)h(x) + h'(x)g(x)

When g(x) = -2x and h(x) = ln(2x),

g'(x) = -2

h(x) = ln2 + lnx
h'(x) = d/dx ln2 + d/dx lnx

And, since ln2 is a constant,

h'(x) = 1/x

Inserting both of these values into the product rule equation,

f'(x) = g'(x)h(x) + h'(x)g(x)
f'(x) = -2 * ln2x + (-2x)/x

Substituting x = -1,

f'(-1) = -2(0.7 + pii) + 2/-1
f'(-1) = -3.4 - 2pii

It is therefore impossible to determine whether it is an increasing or decreasing function at x = -1 because imaginary numbers (i = sqrt-1) cannot easily be dealt with arithmetically.

Apr 5, 2016

Decreasing.

Explanation:

To determine if a function is increasing or decreasing at a certain point, we look at the sign of its derivative at that point.

If the function's derivative is >0 at a point, then it is increasing. Similar logic applies in that a negative (<0) value of the derivative is indicative of the function decreasing at such a point.

So, we must find the derivative of f(x). To do so, we will need to use the product rule. Applying the product rule gives the derivative to be:

f'(x)=ln(2x^2)d/dx(-x)+(-x)d/dx(ln(2x^2))

We can find the internal derivatives so that we can simplify:

d/dx(-x)=-1

To find the next derivative, we must use the chain rule. Applied specifically to the natural logarithm function, we see that

d/dx(ln(u))=1/u*u'

Thus, we see that

d/dx(ln(2x^2))=1/(2x^2)*d/dx(2x^2)=1/(2x^2)*4x=2/x

Plugging these back in, we see that

f'(x)=ln(2x^2)*(-1)-x(2/x)

=-ln(2x^2)-2

So, to determine if the function is increasing or decreasing at x=-1, we must find f'(-1).

f'(-1)=-(ln(2(-1)^2)-2=-ln(2)-2

We don't need a calculator to determine that this is negative, hence the function is decreasing at x=-1.

(For the sake of completeness, you may want to note that -ln(2)-2approx-2.693<0).

We can verify this claim by checking a graph of f(x)=-xln(2x^2):

graph{-xln(2x^2) [-5.45, 5.647, -2.014, 3.534]}

At x=-1, the function is indeed decreasing.