Question #bc24e

1 Answer
Sep 1, 2017

The current density vector may be given as,

#vec j = nqvecv# where, #n# is concentration of charge carriers, #q# is charge on each charge carrier and #v# is their speed.

Therefore,

#(delvecj)/(delt) = nq(dvecv)/(dt)#

But, from Newton's second law,

#m(dvec v)/(dt) = qvec E# where #vec E# is local value of electric field.

Using these results,

#(delvecj)/(delt) = (nq^2vec E)/m#

Therefore,

#del/(delt) nabla X vec j = (nq^2)/m nabla X vec E#

But, from Faraday's law,

#nabla X vec E = - (delvecB)/(delt)#

Therefore we have,

#del/(delt) nabla X vec j = -(nq^2)/m (delvecB)/(delt)#

But, if #vec A# is the vector potential, #vec B = nabla X vec A#

Thus we arrive at the result,

#del/(delt) nabla X vec j = -(nq^2)/m del/(delt)nabla X vec A#

Hence we get the equation,

#vec j = (-nq^2vec A)/m#
which is called London equation.

Not sure if the deduction is perfect, just serves the purpose of a perfect illustration of the equation.

The explanation of Meissner effect can be understood as follows,

We have #vec j = (-nq^2vec A)/m#

Then, from Ampere's law,

#nabla X vec B = mu_0vec j#
#implies nabla X vec B = (-nq^2mu_0)/mvec A#

Taking curl on both sides,

#nabla X nabla X B = (-nq^2mu_0)/m nabla X A#

Using the vector laplacian identity,

#nabla(nabla*vec B) - nabla^2vec B = -(nq^2m_0vec B)/m#

But from Gauss' law of magnetism, #nabla*vec B = 0#

Therefore,

#nabla^2vecB = (nq^2mu_0)/mvec B#

This may be written as,

#nabla^2 vec B = 1/lamda_L^2vec B#
where, #lamda_L = sqrt(m/(nq^2mu_0))# is called London Penetration depth.

The equation accounts for Meissner effect because it allows no solution uniform in space so no uniform magnetic field can exist inside a superconductor.

#vec B =# constant vector is not a solution unless it is identically zero. This follows because if #vec B# is constant, the the LHS is always zero while, RHS is zero only when #vec B = 0#.

References -

Introduction to Solid State Physics by Charles Kittel