Question

Question #a6092

Answer 1

This is overly convoluted. A quicker way to do this is to use `(1.61km)/(mi)`.

However, this is good practice for the increasingly more complex conversions you'll have to do later on,

`109mi * (5280ft)/(mi) * (12"in")/(ft) * (2.54cm)/("in") * (m)/(10^2cm) * (km)/(10^3m) approx 174km`