Which of the following are invalid sets of quantum numbers?

3, 4, 0, 1/2
2, 1, 3, 1/2
-2, 1, 0, -1/2
3, 2, 2, -1/2
3, 2, 0, -1/2

1 Answer
Nov 9, 2016

Several rules apply here:

  1. n >= 1 in integer increments.
  2. l >= 0 in integer increments.
  3. l_max = n-1.
  4. m_l = {-l, -l+1, . . . , -1, 0, +1, . . . , l - 1, l}
  5. m_s = pm"1/2"

For the format (n,l,m_l,m_s):

  • (3, 4, 0, 1/2) is invalid because l > n.
  • (2, 1, 3, 1/2) is invalid because m_l is outside the range of l.
  • (-2, 1, 0, -1/2) is invalid because n < 1.
  • (3, 2, 2, -1/2) is valid because n > 1, l < n, m_l is within the range of l, and m_s is correctly either +"1/2" or -"1/2".
  • (3, 2, 0, -1/2) is valid for the same reason as the fourth choice.