Which of the following sets of 3 quantum numbers is/are possible?

#a)# #2,1,1#
#b)# #3,2,-2#
#c)# #2,0,0#
#d)# #2,0,-1#
#e)# #1,1,-1#

1 Answer
May 15, 2017

This is a situation where you'll just have to remember the rules... The following rules are relevant:

  • The principal quantum number #n# is always one more than the maximum angular momentum #l#. That is, #l_(max) = n-1#.
  • The set of valid #m_l# must be in the range #{0, pm1, pm2, . . . , pm l}#. Thus, if for example, #l = 2#, #m_l# cannot be #-3# because #|-3| > 2#.

These are all that are necessary to determine the impossible combinations. I will identify the possible quantum number combinations, and I will leave you to determine why the remaining combinations are incorrect.

Possible:

  • #a)#: #(n,l,m_l) = (2,1,1)#. This designates one of the #2p# orbitals.
  • #b)# #(n,l,m_l) = (3,2,-2)#. This designates one of the #3d# orbitals.
  • #c)# #(n,l,m_l) = (2,0,0)#. This designates the one #2s# orbital.

Impossible: the rest, because they violate the above rules. Which one violates which rule? What is a valid correction to the combination?

Here is one example; #d)# has #l = 0#, but #m_l# is not in the set #{0}# since #|-1| > 0#. Therefore, #a)# is impossible. One can fix this by letting #m_l = 0#, since #0# is in the set #{0}#. If we have #(n,l,m_l) = (1,0,0)#, we have a #1s# orbital.