Draw the diagrams for "NO"_2^-, "NO"_2^+, and "NO"_2. The HOMO of "NO"_2^- shows it is somewhat anti-bonding. Would you expect the nonbonding electron pairs on nitrogen or oxygen to be more reactive? Discuss

1 Answer
Feb 9, 2018

You've seen the molecular orbital (MO) diagram of "CO"_2:

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler, Fischer, and Tarr, pg. 148

"CO"_2 and "NO"_2^+ are isoelectronic and thus have the same electron configuration. Thus, simply add one or two electrons into the 2b_(3u) and 2b_(2u) to get "NO"_2 and "NO"_2^-, respectively.

Nitrogen atom has 2p atomic orbitals lower by "2.52 eV", and 2s atomic orbitals lower by "6.13 eV" than with carbon atom.

That makes the HOMO (1b_(2g), 1b_(3g)) belongs more so to nitrogen in "NO"_2^(+) than to carbon in "CO"_2. It also means the LUMO (2b_(3u), 2b_(2u)) is less antibonding in "NO"_2^(+) than in "CO"_2.

The nonbonding electron pairs on oxygen in "NO"_2^(-) should be more reactive...

  • The HOMO on "NO"_2^- are the (2b_(3u), 2b_(2u)) MOs, which are half-filled. Those are the lone pair on nitrogen.

The 4a_g is the LUMO then, and it belongs more to nitrogen than oxygen, as it is above nitrogen atom in energy, and nitrogen's atomic orbitals are above oxygen's in energy.

  • The 2a_g and 2b_(1u) nonbonding sigma orbitals, as well as the (1b_(2g), 1b_(3g)) pi orbitals, belong more to oxygen than to nitrogen. Those are the lone pairs on the oxygens.

The lone pair on nitrogen is in pi orbitals, meant for making pi bonds. But the lone pairs on oxygen are in sigma AND pi orbitals, meant for making sigma OR pi bonds.

Hence, upon protonation, the "H"^(+) goes onto the OXYGEN via the sigma orbitals 2a_g and 2b_(1u), making sigma bonds.

![https://upload.wikimedia.org/](useruploads.socratic.org)