How do you use the Squeeze Theorem to find lim (1-cos(x))/x as x approaches zero?

1 Answer
Sep 24, 2015

The usual procedure is to use the squeeze theorem (and some geometry/trigonometry) to prove that lim_(xrarr0)sinx/x=1

Then use that result together with (1-cosx)/x = sin^2x/x(1+cosx) = sinx/x sinx/(1+cosx) along with continuity of sine and cosine at 0 to get
lim_(xrarr0)sinx/x sinx/(1+cosx) = 1 * 0/2 =0.

So we can use the same geometric arguments to get the same bounds on sinx/x for small positive x:

cosx < sinx/x < 1

And for small positive x, we have sinx/(1+cosx) > 0, so we can multiply without changing the inequalities:

cosx sinx/(1+cosx) < sinx/x sinx/(1+cosx) < sinx/(1+cosx)

Using the trigonomtry referred to above, we can rewrite the midle expression to get

cosx sinx/(1+cosx) < (1-cosx)/x < sinx/(1+cosx)

Observe that

lim_(xrarr0^+)(cosx sinx/(1+cosx)) = 1*0/2 = 0

and

lim_(xrarr0^+)sinx/(1+cosx) = 0/2=0

So, by the squeeze theorem,

lim_(xrarr0^+)(1-cosx)/x = 0

For small negative x, we keep the inequality: cosx < sinx/x < 1, but for these x, we have

sinx/(1+cosx) < 0, so when we multiply we do need to change the inequalities to:

cosx sinx/(1+cosx) > (1-cosx)/x > sinx/(1+cosx)

We can still use the squeeze theorem to get:

lim_(xrarr0^-)(1-cosx)/x = 0

Because the left and right limits are both 0, the limit is 0.

(This feels very artificial to me. Perhaps because I am more familiar with the common approach mentioned at the beginning of this answer. or perhaps because it is artificial. I don't know.)