#tildenu = c - R_H / n_2^2# (#tildenu = "wavenumber"#) This equation can be written in the form #y = mx + c# What will the intercept of the line on the #y# axis (at #x = 0#) be, in terms of #n_1#?

1 Answer
May 16, 2018

The y-intercept is:

#c = R_H/n_1^2#

assuming this is for a fixed starting quantum level #n_1#.

For example, if we obtained frequencies from a hydrogen absorption spectrum based on excitations from an unknown #n_1# to a guess of #n_2 = 3,4,5,6,7#, and the peaks are all of VERY low intensity, then we get:

From this, the slope is #E_1 = -R_H# and the y-intercept is #R_H/n_1^2#.

Since #R_H = "109737 cm"^(-1)#,

#n_1 = sqrt(R_H/c) = sqrt("109737 cm"^(-1)/("27434 cm"^(-1))) = 2.000002 ~~ 2#

So, the starting quantum level was #n_1 = 2#.

  • Had we guessed #n_2 = 4,5,6,7,8#, we would get #n_1 = 2.721963#, with an #R^2 = 0.9961#.
  • Had we guessed #n_2 = 5,6,7,8,9#, we would get #n_1 = 3.465822#, with an #R^2 = 0.9886#.
  • Had we guessed #n_2 = 6,7,8,9,10#, we would get #n_1 = 4.229976#, with an #R^2 = 0.9807#.

Lastly, because the peaks were of very low intensity, it couldn't be that #n_1 = 1# because that is the usual occupation of the lowest-energy electron in the hydrogen atom. Low-intensity peaks suggest that the electron started in an excited state.

(You really can tell when you've not correctly guessed the lowest #n_2#.)


If you want to plot

#tildenu = c - R_H/(n_2^2)#

you would use #tildenu -= y# and #1/n_2^2 -= x#. I suppose this could be rewritten in the usual Rydberg equation form as:

#overbrace(tildenu)^(y) = -R_H(1/n_2^2 - c/(R_H))#

#= overbrace(-R_H)^"slope" cdot overbrace(1/n_2^2)^(x) + overbrace(c)^("y-intercept")#

where #R_H = "109737 cm"^(-1)# is the Rydberg constant.

We compare with the actual equation:

#tildenu = -R_H(1/n_2^2 - 1/n_1^2)#

From this, we see that

#c/R_H = 1/n_1^2#

Therefore, the y-intercept would be:

#color(blue)(c = R_H/n_1^2)#

and the slope would be the ground state energy of hydrogen atom, #-"109737 cm"^(-1)#.