In a compound #FeCl_2#, the orbital angular momentum of the last electron in its cation and magnetic moment (in Bohr Magneton ) of this compound is?
2 Answers
I'll answer the first question, but you should ask one question per question page.
In
#[Ar] 3d^6 color(red)(cancel(color(black)(4s^2)))# ,
or
#ul(uarr darr)" "ul(uarr color(white)(dar))" "ul(uarr color(white)(dar))" "ul(uarr color(white)(dar))" "ul(uarr color(white)(dar))#
#underbrace(" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "" "" "" "" "3d#
For the orbital angular momentum of the last electron in
We're going to get the magnetic moment next.
#bb(mu_(S+L) = 2.0023sqrt(S(S+1) + 1/4 L(L+1)))# ,where:
#g = 2.0023# is the electron-spin g-factor, or gyromagnetic ratio.#S = M_S = sum_i |m_(s,i)|# is the total spin angular momentum of the electrons in the atom;#m_(s,i)# is the spin quantum number of electron#i# in orbital#i# .#L = M_L = sum_i |m_(l,i)|# is the total orbital angular momentum of all the electrons in the atom;#m_(l,i)# is the magnetic quantum number of electron#i# in orbital#i# .
With
#S = |4 xx +1/2| = 2#
#L = |2 cdot (-2) + (-1) + 0 + 1 + 2| = 2#
So, the magnetic moment is:
#color(blue)(mu_(S+L)) = 2.0023sqrt(2(2+1) + 1/4 (2(2+1)))#
#= 2.0023sqrt7.5 = color(blue)("5.484 Bohr Magnetons")#
while the measured magnetic moment is about
And I would think that this is also important... In a free-ion field, we omit the total angular momentum
#bb(""^(2S+1) L)# ,where:
#S# and#L# are as defined before.#2S+1# is the spin multiplicity of the atom.#L = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . . harr S, P, D, F, . . . #
We already drew the ground-state configuration above. We thus have the free-ion ground-state term symbol for a
Regarding the second question...
You gave for the cumulative ionization energies:
#"Li"(g) -> "Li"^(3+) (g) + 3e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_3)("Li") = "19800 kJ/mol"# #" "bb((1))#
#"Li"(g) -> "Li"^(+) (g) + e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li") = "520 kJ/mol"# #" "" "bb((2))#
And you are asked for what seems to be the individual ionization energies:
#"Li"^(+) (g) -> "Li"^(2+) + e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li"^(+),i) = ???# #" "bb((3))#
#"Li"^(2+) (g) -> "Li"^(3+) + e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_2)("Li"^(+),i) = ???# #" "bb((4))#
We can first by use Hess's Law to form the proper reaction by cancellation of matching substances on both sides.
Try splitting
#1)" "cancel("Li"(g)) -> cancel("Li"^(+) (g)) + cancel(e^(-))# ,#DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li") = "520 kJ/mol"#
#2)" ""Li"^(+)(g) -> "Li"^(2+) (g) + e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li"^(+),i) = ???#
#3)" ""Li"^(2+)(g) -> "Li"^(3+) (g) + e^(-)# ,#DeltaH_(IE_2)("Li"^(+),i) = ???#
#DeltaH_(IE_3)("Li") = "19800 kJ/mol"# (after adding steps#1-3# )
#cancel("Li"^(+) (g)) + cancel(e^(-)) -> cancel("Li"(g))# ,#-DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li") = -"520 kJ/mol"#
Thus, by inspection of the remaining reaction (due to adding them)
#"Li"^(+) (g) -> "Li"^(3+) + 2e^(-)# ,
we currently have:
#DeltaH_(IE_3)("Li") - DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li") = DeltaH_(IE_1)("Li"^(+),i) + DeltaH_(IE_2)("Li"^(+),i)#
#= DeltaH_(IE_2)("Li"^(+))# (cumulative)
#= (19800 - 520) "kJ/mol" = "19280 kJ/mol"#
We have two unknowns here, but not enough equations. To be continued...?