Why is the electron configuration of "Fe"^(2+) NOT [Ar] 4s^2 3d^4 but [Ar] 3d^6?

1 Answer
Dec 3, 2015

I can see why this can seem counterintuitive at first. The last orbital you fill when making neutral "Fe" is the 3d.

"Fe" (neutral) is [Ar]4s^2 3d^6, where one 3d orbital is doubly-occupied. Since one of them has two electrons, it adds a bit of repulsion that would help in removing an electron. Additionally, one might be tempted to remove electrons from the 3d orbitals first, simply because they were filled last.

But there's a problem with that assumption: the 4s orbital is doubly-occupied too.

It is important to realize that the electrons easiest to remove are removed first, and those in the highest-energy orbital tend to belong to that category. In this case, the 4s orbitals are slightly higher in energy, so those get removed first. As a result... we get:

color(blue)([Ar]3d^6)

NOT:

color(red)([Ar]4s^2 3d^4)

As a result, this is paramagnetic (i.e. it has at least one unpaired electron in its orbital configuration).