Order by bond length? "NO", "NO"^(+), "NO"^(-)
1 Answer
The bond strength increases going from
r_("N"-"O")^("NO"^(-)) > r_("N"-"O")^("NO") > r_("N"-"O")^("NO"^(+))
To start with,
color(red)(["*"]) - except for the orbital ordering below thepi^"*" (the2b_1,2b_2 ) of these species
To prove this, here is the MO diagram of
(The original was this; I added the orbital depictions and symmetry labels.)
Quick overview of what the labels correspond to what MOs:
1a_1 is thesigma_(2s) bonding MO.2a_1 is thesigma_(2s)^"*" antibonding MO.1b_1 is thepi_(2p_x) bonding MO.1b_2 is thepi_(2p_y) bonding MO.3a_1 is thesigma_(2p_z) bonding MO, but it's relatively nonbonding with respect to oxygen.2b_1 is thepi_(2p_x)^"*" antibonding MO.2b_2 is thepi_(2p_y)^"*" antibonding MO.4a_1 is thesigma_(2p_z)^"*" antibonding MO.
Note that for
"NO"^(+) hasbb0 pi^"*" antibonding electrons."NO" hasbb(1) pi^"*" antibonding electron."NO"^(-) hasbb(2) pi^"*" antibonding electrons.
As the number of antibonding electrons increases, the
Thus, the bond strength increases going from