Order by bond length? "NO", "NO"^(+), "NO"^(-)

1 Answer
Sep 17, 2017

The bond strength increases going from "NO"^(-) to "NO"^(+), and the bond length consequently shortens going from "NO"^(-) to "NO"^(+).

r_("N"-"O")^("NO"^(-)) > r_("N"-"O")^("NO") > r_("N"-"O")^("NO"^(+))


To start with, "O"_2 is (roughly) isoelectronic with "NO"^(-)""^(color(red)("[*]")), and "O"_2 has two pi^"*" antibonding electrons, as you should know from its MO diagram from your textbook. Thus, so does "NO"^(-).

color(red)(["*"]) - except for the orbital ordering below the pi^"*" (the 2b_1,2b_2) of these species

To prove this, here is the MO diagram of "NO" (Miessler et al., Answer Key):

(The original was this; I added the orbital depictions and symmetry labels.)

Quick overview of what the labels correspond to what MOs:

  • 1a_1 is the sigma_(2s) bonding MO.
  • 2a_1 is the sigma_(2s)^"*" antibonding MO.
  • 1b_1 is the pi_(2p_x) bonding MO.
  • 1b_2 is the pi_(2p_y) bonding MO.
  • 3a_1 is the sigma_(2p_z) bonding MO, but it's relatively nonbonding with respect to oxygen.
  • 2b_1 is the pi_(2p_x)^"*" antibonding MO.
  • 2b_2 is the pi_(2p_y)^"*" antibonding MO.
  • 4a_1 is the sigma_(2p_z)^"*" antibonding MO.

Note that for "O"_2, the 1b_1,1b_2 and 3a_1 orbitals are switched in energy. From this MO diagram, we can see that:

  • "NO"^(+) has bb0 pi^"*" antibonding electrons.
  • "NO" has bb(1) pi^"*" antibonding electron.
  • "NO"^(-) has bb(2) pi^"*" antibonding electrons.

As the number of antibonding electrons increases, the "N"-"O" bond weakens, having acquired antibonding character (which as the name suggests, goes against making a bond).

Thus, the bond strength increases going from "NO"^(-) to "NO"^(+), and the bond length consequently shortens going from "NO"^(-) to "NO"^(+).